First we have unknown empty space (here is a small window into arbitrary tilings of zeros in all directions, with both inside and outside everywhere, in a 2D lattice:

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

It could be any Polygonal or Polyhedral lattice-space.

This space of all zeros referred to is what surrounds Pascal's Triangle or any pascallated geometric structure. It has no dimensions, though to be interperable at all we use dimensionality: It is a null dimension. Later on, we use further dimensions. To my amazement, if a tetrahedra is a regular solid we cannot say what limit of dimensions it may have (in a way purely opaque). Therefore I view the prismoid shape as the most simple discrete combinatoric solid. Zeros, instead of #ERRORS surround the periphery of Pascal's Triangle, and go out in all directions to the edge of a calculational space only (not forever). In any case I will explore, the factorial (!) of any negative number could be definable as zero. No, we are not taking absolute values of factorials to fill this empty space with fractions, because we want an analog of the recursively generated pattern.

...

Next, we describe an anti-space to this space of zeros, like a space with Neutrinos moving through it in all directions (full of standing waves). The two spaces occasionally are adjacent, thus because one is defined as empty / receptive:

Empty level:

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Energetic level:

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Note that this dual space also has not yet any center point.

...

Now we have modeled two spatial fabrics, one that is just empty space, and another space that is a refuge for the inpreceptably-fast-moving quanta called Neutrinos. This view presents that they travel at all velocities that would otherwise be unused, fulfill the existance of matter in an abstract way.

Then we unify one point between these spaces in order to create the monad or center point where some indication of a quantifiable contact has taken place, a symbol saying "look this one [character expression] is where I am safe". Yet it does not know anything, it is just a symbol of interaction (that has not been interacting before?).

0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

We may say that a specific single Neutrino has for some reason slowed on a curve and unified with a space that was originally empty, perhaps finally let go of its inhibited interactional timidity or formless basis; previously lacking a center-point -- now completed. Note that all these geometric spaces are geometrically identical at the input of the number "1" and it is for this reason they all are included in this enfolded nimbus (extensible to cavernous usable empty space of extra zeros, through density adjustments in and of original algorythm space) and its reflected geometries in the ramifications of the [D] zeros that are directly adjacent to this monad, that being the zero'th iteration N=0, exactly the same no matter what summative or combinatory Pascalloid we examine. This is of mid 19th century Combinatorics, but we will skip beyond simple Choice Theory. In this case, there is only one answer to the question of what we are paying attention to. It is this one subject we have a word for. Etc. (# represents number of possible outcomes)

The process in this case being nominal maintenance of a quanta (1) in a space of zeros (who's tiling pattern is still arbitrary, however this is changed from the original space fabric of just zeros and a separate layer of Neutrinos (Special-Relativity-ignorant quanta) such that these zeros are now centralized around the monad, and form slightly less photon-like, more coherent, and smaller, now centralized set of total numerical patterns that are potentially attached to it as the same kernel may connect all spaces to the original Pascal's Triangle. By bringing just one Neutrino through as a coherent unit-particle, we may note an overall pattern emerges we could call a "multi-dimensional fuzzy dot". It may be used in some form to do digital shape-blur calculations.

@

The next algorithm begins with input number (1) and repeatedly moves it one increment through time, keeping it centered at the same location in space, but copying it from one present tense into the next. Past is added to compute future, or the tensions of many elements co-operate to present wrongfully nostalgic visions of the past. That being the case, the 1 or substututes such as 1X10^q will retain its place in space every instant that this algorithm is repeated. Metaphorically: a bundle of energy in a process that strictly maintains its continuous structural integrity, to a harmonic extent (N).

This next algorithm, only the tiniest bit more complex, N progresses:

N=1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N=2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N=3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
N=4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
N=5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

What units? It could be anything really.

The input number (or whatever it represents) is now translating at a fixed location of energy/mass within tiling pattern of zeros. The algorithm merely translates a line of numbers in one direction as the tiled algorithm is repeatedly applied across the entire space with each incremental increase of [n].

The next algorithm introduces something akin to crystallization, or at least that this translation epitaxially (involving exponents and the fuzzy dot) may spread out from the source input number as a sheet space that is consistant. This first example is only a slight bit less complicated than Pascal's Triangle, but it is the same thing as self-cancelling Pascal's triangle to comfortably say that it is just a natural ratio that may indicate the pure rationality of Cause and Effect, in that effects create more effects causing more expanded shape. N becomes (process-wise) a linear time domain. This is in process is built the foundation of 'where there are numbers to be located' in Pascal's Triangle, without the actual numbers yet!

n=1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n=2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n=3
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
n=4
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
n=5
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0

This represents not only a space of identifier variables that will exemplify 'velocity', but also a trail of effect left behind in the process. In this way, it leads as a metaphore to a type of filamental crystal, as a continuous object that has some unique or appealing form, quite obviously simulating or following along a line, no differentiation of any kind between points yet, like a ray, but also like an agle sweep segment of a ray, like an idealized data solidification process that cascades forwards as long as conditions are right; time passing forward as a computational process; then also as basic underlying algorithm substructure.
Note however that no new data is truly generated as the quantum generation process of this or any given Scallated set of numbers, and yet with no new data we could still create a space for data and generate a very large file, with limitless interpolable applications or interpretations.

o